Gone In Sixty Seconds
In this post, I we informed readers that Angelina Jolie committed the thought crime of approving of the continued US military presence in Iraq. After doing a little research, this blog has learned that Jolie has agreed to play the lead role, Dagney Taggart, in the upcoming film adaptation of Ayn Rand's classic book, "Atlas Shrugged." Rand's philosophy is about as opposed to the Hollywood collective belief system as is possible. Rand even had the nerve to escape the worker's paradise (USSR) to come to the land of discrimination (USA). Becasue of this, Rand's philosophy is not seriously taught at Ivy League Universities. Only the star power of Jolie and husband Brad Pitt got the film green lighted.
It took little time for Hollywood to denounce Jolie as a non-person. This site gives an excellent denunciation of Angelina. Some examples:
- Today I Weep. With a heavy heart I denounce Angelina Jolie. For non-person J has brought much happiness to my life. Hetero-men and lesbian comrades around the world have admired her beauty and activism.
- In spite of all the kinkiness in her younger days and nude scenes in her earlier films, in spite of her Progressive, Hollywood-style domestic situation, in spite of her work with the fecking UN, it is obvious that the regressive evil within is coming to the surface.
- Who is she to say things are going well in the quagmire that is Iraq and who gave her permission to think for herself in the first place? And why am I asking questions when I can simply make my own assumptions on the matter and have everyone tell me that my assumptions are indeed the truth?
However, the denunciation of Angelina leaves a question. Who will replace her? Her replacement must have Hollywood success, look gorgeous, and most importantly trumpet the orthodox Hollywood dogma. I have a very strong candidate:
2007 Academy Award Winner for Best Actress Marion Cotillard should replace Angelina Jolie. The Academy Award speaks to her success as an actress. This picture shows that she's has the requisite looks.
But what of her political viewpoint. Does she hate America enough to survive in a community where Michael Moore is considered a serious thinker? From the London Telegraph:
"I think we’re lied to about a number of things," she said, singling out September 11.
Referring to the two passenger jets flown into the World Trade Centre, Miss Cotillard said: "We see other towers of the same kind being hit by planes, are they burned? There was a tower, I believe it was in Spain, which burned for 24 hours.
It never collapsed. None of these towers collapsed. And there [New York], in a few minutes, the whole thing collapsed."
Miss Cotillard suggested that the towers, planned in the early 1960s, were an outdated "money sucker" which would have cost so much to modernise that it was easier to destroy them.
Turning to America’s space programme, she said: "Did a man really walk on the moon? I saw plenty of documentaries on it, and I really wondered. And in any case I don’t believe all they tell me, that’s for sure."
Marion Cotillard, welcome to Hollywood. I'm sure you'll have a long and productive career here.
It took little time for Hollywood to denounce Jolie as a non-person. This site gives an excellent denunciation of Angelina. Some examples:
- Today I Weep. With a heavy heart I denounce Angelina Jolie. For non-person J has brought much happiness to my life. Hetero-men and lesbian comrades around the world have admired her beauty and activism.
- In spite of all the kinkiness in her younger days and nude scenes in her earlier films, in spite of her Progressive, Hollywood-style domestic situation, in spite of her work with the fecking UN, it is obvious that the regressive evil within is coming to the surface.
- Who is she to say things are going well in the quagmire that is Iraq and who gave her permission to think for herself in the first place? And why am I asking questions when I can simply make my own assumptions on the matter and have everyone tell me that my assumptions are indeed the truth?
However, the denunciation of Angelina leaves a question. Who will replace her? Her replacement must have Hollywood success, look gorgeous, and most importantly trumpet the orthodox Hollywood dogma. I have a very strong candidate:
2007 Academy Award Winner for Best Actress Marion Cotillard should replace Angelina Jolie. The Academy Award speaks to her success as an actress. This picture shows that she's has the requisite looks.
But what of her political viewpoint. Does she hate America enough to survive in a community where Michael Moore is considered a serious thinker? From the London Telegraph:
"I think we’re lied to about a number of things," she said, singling out September 11.
Referring to the two passenger jets flown into the World Trade Centre, Miss Cotillard said: "We see other towers of the same kind being hit by planes, are they burned? There was a tower, I believe it was in Spain, which burned for 24 hours.
It never collapsed. None of these towers collapsed. And there [New York], in a few minutes, the whole thing collapsed."
Miss Cotillard suggested that the towers, planned in the early 1960s, were an outdated "money sucker" which would have cost so much to modernise that it was easier to destroy them.
Turning to America’s space programme, she said: "Did a man really walk on the moon? I saw plenty of documentaries on it, and I really wondered. And in any case I don’t believe all they tell me, that’s for sure."
Marion Cotillard, welcome to Hollywood. I'm sure you'll have a long and productive career here.
posted by Nihilist in Golf Pants at 3/02/2008 10:50:00 AM
8 Comments:
Don’t believe one optimistic word from any public figure about the economy or humanity in general. They are all part of the problem. Its like a game of Monopoly. In America, the richest 1% now hold 1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. Unlike ‘lesser’ estimates, this includes all stocks, bonds, cash, and material assets held by America’s richest 1%. Even that filthy pig Oprah acknowledged that it was at about 50% in 2006. Naturally, she put her own ‘humanitarian’ spin on it. Calling attention to her own ‘good will’. WHAT A DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOB. THE RICHEST 1% HAVE LITERALLY MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. Don’t fall for any of their ‘humanitarian’ CRAP. ITS A SHAM. THESE PEOPLE ARE CAUSING THE SAME PROBLEMS THEY PRETEND TO CARE ABOUT. Ask any professor of economics. Money does not grow on trees. The government can’t just print up more on a whim. At any given time, there is a relative limit to the wealth within ANY economy of ANY size. So when too much wealth accumulates at the top, the middle class slip further into debt and the lower class further into poverty. A similar rule applies worldwide. The world’s richest 1% now own over 40% of ALL WORLD WEALTH. This is EVEN AFTER you account for all of this ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS from celebrities and executives. ITS A SHAM. As they get richer and richer, less wealth is left circulating beneath them. This is the single greatest underlying cause for the current US recession. The middle class can no longer afford to sustain their share of the economy. Their wealth has been gradually transfered to the richest 1%. One way or another, we suffer because of their incredible greed. We are talking about TRILLIONS of dollars. Transfered FROM US TO THEM. Over a period of about 27 years. Thats Reaganomics for you. The wealth does not ‘trickle down’ as we were told it would. It just accumulates at the top. Shrinking the middle class and expanding the lower class. Causing a domino effect of socio-economic problems. But the rich will never stop. They will never settle for a reasonable share of ANYTHING. They will do whatever it takes to get even richer. Leaving even less of the pie for the other 99% of us to share. At the same time, they throw back a few tax deductable crumbs and call themselves ‘humanitarians’. IT CAN’T WORK THIS WAY. Any 'humanitarian' progress made in one area will be lost in another. EVERY SINGLE TIME. IT ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT WORK THIS WAY. This is going to end just like a game of Monopoly. The current US recession will drag on for years and lead into the worst US depression of all time. The richest 1% will live like royalty while the rest of us fight over jobs, food, and gasoline. Crime, poverty, and suicide will skyrocket. So don’t fall for all of this PR CRAP from Hollywood, Pro Sports, and Wall Street PIGS. ITS A SHAM. Remember: They are filthy rich EVEN AFTER their tax deductable contributions. Greedy pigs. Now, we are headed for the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time. SEND A “THANK YOU” NOTE TO YOUR FAVORITE MILLIONAIRE. ITS THEIR FAULT. I’m not discounting other factors like China, sub-prime, or gas prices. But all of those factors combined still pale in comparison to that HUGE transfer of wealth to the rich. Anyway, those other factors are all related and further aggrivated because of GREED. If it weren’t for the OBSCENE distribution of wealth within our country, there never would have been such a market for sub-prime to begin with. Which by the way, was another trick whipped up by greedy bankers and executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. The credit industry has been ENDORSED by people like Oprah, Ellen, Dr Phil, and many other celebrities. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. Now, there are commercial ties between nearly every industry and every public figure. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘good will’ BS. ITS A LIE. If you fall for it, then you’re a fool. If you see any real difference between the moral character of a celebrity, politician, attorney, or executive, then you’re a fool. WAKE UP PEOPLE. ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. The 1% club will always say or do whatever it takes to get as rich as possible. Without the slightest regard for anything or anyone but themselves. Vioxx. Their idea. Sub-prime. Their idea. NAFTA. Their idea. Outsourcing. Their idea. The commercial lobbyist. Their idea. The multi-million dollar lawsuit. Their idea. $200 cell phone bills. Their idea. $200 basketball shoes. Their idea. $30 late fees. Their idea. $30 NSF fees. Their idea. $20 DVDs. Their idea. Subliminal advertising. Their idea. The MASSIVE campaign to turn every American into a brainwashed credit card, pharmaceutical, love-sick, celebrity junkie. Their idea. All of which concentrate the world’s wealth and resources and wreak havok on society. All of which have been CREATED AND ENDORSED by celebrities, athletes, and executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘ good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS. ITS A SHAM. NOTHING BUT TAX DEDUCTABLE PR CRAP. Bottom line: The richest 1% will soon tank the largest economy in the world. It will be like nothing we’ve ever seen before. and thats just the beginning. Greed will eventually tank every major economy in the world. Causing millions to suffer and die. Oprah, Angelina, Brad, Bono, and Bill are not part of the solution. They are part of the problem. EXTREME WEALTH HAS MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. WITHOUT WORLD PROSPERITY, THERE WILL NEVER BE WORLD PEACE OR ANYTHING EVEN CLOSE. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL. Of course, the rich will throw a fit and call me a madman. Of course, their ignorant fans will do the same. You have to expect that. But I speak the truth. If you don’t believe me, then copy this entry and run it by any professor of economics or socio-economics. Then tell a friend. Call the local radio station. Re-post this entry or put it in your own words. Be one of the first to predict the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time and explain its cause. WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE.
But you've addressed neither Miss Cotillard's HOTNESS nor her KOOKINESS!!!
WHY ARE YOU DUCKING THE QUESTION, Anonymous? (If that's even your name.)
Anonymous,
I love it when a plan comes together!
JEREMY NORTHAM AS JOHN GALT
If you would like to see the brilliant Jeremy Northam as John Galt in
the movie "Atlas Shrugged", please sign this petition which is being
sent to Baldwin Entertainment, executive producers of the film.
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/johngalt
"Of course, the rich will throw a fit and call me a madman."
Not necessary.
That dude anonymous scares me, that rant is crazy, and world prosperity isn't possible anyways so I'm confused as to what he's talking about in the first place
I can't understand them. why they would be a favor in something like that after they haven't been doing a lot of charitative work.
It is a delicate topic, at the end it doesn't matter what we think as the military will not going to ask us for our opinion.
Post a Comment
<< Home